Navigating Legal Challenges in Digital Evidence: A Case Study of Cybercrime Prosecutions

Authors

  • Jordan Miller PhD
  • Kai Rodriguez Associate Professor
  • Casey Hill Professor

Keywords:

cybercrime, digital evidence, legal challenges, prosecution strategies, jurisdictional issues, cybersecurity law, technological advancements, evidence law, criminal justice

Abstract

This study explores the complexities and challenges of prosecuting cybercrime cases through the lens of digital evidence. Given the exponential growth in internet usage and technological advancements, the legal system faces unprecedented hurdles in adapting traditional legal frameworks to address digital evidence effectively. Employing a case study methodology, this analysis examines notable legal precedents and prosecutorial strategies utilized in landmark cybercrime cases. The findings highlight significant gaps in existing legal standards and the pressing need for updated regulations that account for the nuances of digital evidence. Ultimately, this paper offers recommendations for legal practitioners and policymakers to enhance the efficacy of cybercrime prosecutions while ensuring justice and due process are upheld.

Author Biographies

Jordan Miller, PhD

PhD
Humboldt University of Berlin
Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany

Kai Rodriguez, Associate Professor

Associate Professor
Harvard Law School
Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Casey Hill, Professor

Professor
University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne
12 Place du Panthéon, 75005 Paris, France

References

Kullolli, B. (2018). Confidentiality-A Two-Appeal Principle. European Journal of Social Sciences, 1(3), 53-60.

Published

2024-09-18

Issue

Section

Articles