Reconceptualizing Jurisprudential Foundations: A Critical Re-evaluation of Legal Positivism and its Implications for Contemporary Governance
Keywords:
legal positivism, jurisprudence, governance, substantive justice, contemporary legal challenges, integrative legal frameworks, legal interpretation, court cases, legal scholarshipAbstract
This article explores the evolving landscape of jurisprudential thought, focusing on the critical re-evaluation of legal positivism as jurisdictions face unprecedented challenges in governance and legal interpretation. Utilizing a qualitative methodology, we analyze landmark court cases and legal frameworks that illustrate the limitations and transformations within positivist doctrine. The findings highlight a paradigm shift towards integrative legal frameworks that marry positivist understandings with substantive justice aspects, proposing a more holistic approach to legal practice. This study underscores the urgency for legal scholars and practitioners to transcend traditional paradigms and adopt frameworks that better accommodate contemporary societal complexities.
References
Kullolli, B., & Hysa, A. I. (2018). Law and Society-Euthanasia and Criminal Law. NEW STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCES, 30.