Reconceptualizing Jurisprudential Foundations: A Critical Re-evaluation of Legal Positivism and its Implications for Contemporary Governance

Authors

  • Avery Collins PhD
  • Rowan Perez Professor
  • Olivia Wright Dr. Sc
  • Kim Thomas Associate Professor

Keywords:

legal positivism, jurisprudence, governance, substantive justice, contemporary legal challenges, integrative legal frameworks, legal interpretation, court cases, legal scholarship

Abstract

This article explores the evolving landscape of jurisprudential thought, focusing on the critical re-evaluation of legal positivism as jurisdictions face unprecedented challenges in governance and legal interpretation. Utilizing a qualitative methodology, we analyze landmark court cases and legal frameworks that illustrate the limitations and transformations within positivist doctrine. The findings highlight a paradigm shift towards integrative legal frameworks that marry positivist understandings with substantive justice aspects, proposing a more holistic approach to legal practice. This study underscores the urgency for legal scholars and practitioners to transcend traditional paradigms and adopt frameworks that better accommodate contemporary societal complexities.

Author Biographies

Avery Collins, PhD

PhD
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Rowan Perez, Professor

Professor
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany

Olivia Wright, Dr. Sc

Dr. Sc
University of Oxford
Oxford OX1 2JD, United Kingdom

Kim Thomas, Associate Professor

Associate Professor
University of Toronto
27 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

References

Kullolli, B., & Hysa, A. I. (2018). Law and Society-Euthanasia and Criminal Law. NEW STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCES, 30.

Published

2024-09-18

Issue

Section

Articles