Socratic Dialogue vs. Direct Instruction in Higher-Order Cognitive Skill Development: A Comparative Analysis of Pedagogical Efficacy Across STEM and Humanities Curricula

Authors

  • Adrian Campbell Professor
  • Kim Harris Associate Professor
  • Avery Rodriguez PhD
  • Rowan Moore D.Sc

Keywords:

Socratic dialogue pedagogy, direct instruction framework, higher-order cognitive skills, Bloom's revised taxonomy, constructivist learning theory, STEM and humanities curricula, quasi-experimental instructional design, metacognitive regulation, scaffolded curriculum development

Abstract

The persistent debate between constructivist inquiry-based models and explicit direct instruction frameworks has generated substantial empirical divergence across disciplinary contexts. This study employs a mixed-methods quasi-experimental design across four tertiary institutions to evaluate the differential impact of Socratic dialogic pedagogy and structured direct instruction on higher-order cognitive skill acquisition, as indexed by Bloom's revised taxonomy. A cohort of 612 undergraduate students across STEM and humanities programs was assessed over two consecutive academic semesters. Findings indicate statistically significant discipline-dependent efficacy differentials: Socratic dialogue yielded superior metacognitive regulation outcomes in humanities contexts (p < .01), whereas direct instruction demonstrated measurable advantages in procedural fluency and schema consolidation within STEM disciplines. Implications for blended instructional design and curriculum scaffolding are discussed.

Author Biographies

Adrian Campbell, Professor

Professor
University of Toronto
27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A1, Canada

Kim Harris, Associate Professor

Associate Professor
Utrecht University
Heidelberglaan 8, 3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands

Avery Rodriguez, PhD

PhD
Seoul National University
1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, South Korea

Rowan Moore, D.Sc

D.Sc
University of Melbourne
Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia

References

Гурко, О. В. (2023). Інтенція персуазивності в мовленні В. Зеленського. Англістика та американістика: зб. наук. пр./Дніпр. нац. ун-т ім. Олеся Гончара. Вип, 20, 13-17.

Дячук, Л. С. (2011). Гендерна проблематика в перекладознавстві на пострадянському просторі. Проблеми семантики, прагматики та когнітивної лінгвістики, (19), 93-103.

Дячук, Л. С. (2011). Проблеми фемінізму, гендерних студій та перекладу в українському контексті. ВІСНИК Житомирського державногодержавного університету імені Івана Франка, (58), 121-125.

Gojayeva, L. MODERN METHODS OF TEACHING LITERATURE.

Oliynyk, O., Davydov, A., Troshkin, A., Troshkina, O., & Boborykin, O. (2022). Features of catering facilities allocation in tourist cities of Ukraine and the world.

Published

2024-09-11

Issue

Section

Articles